by paulmdavis January 13, 2012
by paulmdavis January 11, 2012

thepeoplesrecord:

growfoodraisehell:

The Occupy Austin Guerrilla Garderners got together this morning and reclaimed some land for the people.  We brought the logs from a field near my house, but were able to find the footstones (and the water) in the creek right behind this space. 

We ripped up the weeds with shovels, laid compost, and planted many seeds.  Assuming this garden is not destroyed by the city, soon there will be broccoli, lettuce, cabbage, and radishes growing here.

Reclaim the commons.  Reclaim food.  Reclaim your body.  Reclaim your birthright to enter into a relationship with your landbase.  Decolonize Everywhere.

Well that’s awesome. 

by paulmdavis January 11, 2012
by paulmdavis January 11, 2012

espacio-sideral:

1. It’s Diverse

Detractors like to refer to Linux’s diversity as a “fragmentation problem,” but in fact it’s one of its greatest strengths. Users have countless Linux distributions to choose from, whether it’s one like Mint, Fedora or Ubuntu that puts usability at the forefront, or…

by paulmdavis January 11, 2012
by paulmdavis January 11, 2012

  I’ve been following Mike Daisey’s work for quite some time, and was bummed that I missed his one-man show, The Agony and Ecstasy of Steve Jobs, when I visited New York this past November. Despite my weariness with This American Life, this week’s Daisey-centric episode is a must-listen. It includes an interview with Daisey, as well as excerpts from his show, in which he evocatively, shockingly, and at times hilariously details his trip to China to view the factories where Apple devices are made. The unethical labor practices that produce our iDevices are modern atrocities, and Apple plays an outsized role in perpetuating them because of the company’s skill at dominating the supply and manufacturing chain.
  
  Don’t own Apple devices? You’re not off the hook, and neither are the makers of your devices. A truncated list of the other companies that also manufacture their products at the same plants as Apple: Acer, Amazon, Dell, HP, Intel, Logitech, Microsoft, Nintendo, Nokia, Panasonic, Philips, Samsung, Sharp, Sony, and Toshiba.


Apple’s Devices Are Made of Blood and Misery. As Are All The Rest. So Do Something About It. | 12 Pt. Plan

I’ve been following Mike Daisey’s work for quite some time, and was bummed that I missed his one-man show, The Agony and Ecstasy of Steve Jobs, when I visited New York this past November. Despite my weariness with This American Life, this week’s Daisey-centric episode is a must-listen. It includes an interview with Daisey, as well as excerpts from his show, in which he evocatively, shockingly, and at times hilariously details his trip to China to view the factories where Apple devices are made. The unethical labor practices that produce our iDevices are modern atrocities, and Apple plays an outsized role in perpetuating them because of the company’s skill at dominating the supply and manufacturing chain.

Don’t own Apple devices? You’re not off the hook, and neither are the makers of your devices. A truncated list of the other companies that also manufacture their products at the same plants as Apple: Acer, Amazon, Dell, HP, Intel, Logitech, Microsoft, Nintendo, Nokia, Panasonic, Philips, Samsung, Sharp, Sony, and Toshiba.

Apple’s Devices Are Made of Blood and Misery. As Are All The Rest. So Do Something About It. | 12 Pt. Plan

by paulmdavis January 11, 2012

  Apple and other famous technology companies and their millions of customers don’t have blood on their hands. Well, maybe.
  
  After reading a piece by Nick Kristof in the Times last year – “Death by Gadget” – an Apple fan fired off an email to Steve Jobs asking how Apple ensures that its materials aren’t coming from a conflict hot zone, much like the “blood diamonds” that became infamous in recent decades. About an hour later, a reply showed up in his inbox:
  
  
    Yes. We require all of our suppliers to certify in writing that they use conflict few [free] materials. But honestly there is no way for them to be sure. Until someone invents a way to chemically trace minerals from the source mine, it’s a very difficult problem.
    
    Sent from my iPhone
  
  
  As Suroosh Alvi and Jason Mojica reported in their trip to the Democratic Republic of Congo earlier this year for Vice / Motherboard (article here, and the video is at the bottom of this post), the source of the materials used to make these pretty things – materials like tungsten, tantalum, tin, and gold – aren’t pretty. For decades, they’ve helped to fund a terrible, now smoldering, civil war.


Can We Have Gadgets That Are Not Made of Blood | Motherboard

From the Shareable archives: Demanding Ethical Gadgets

Apple and other famous technology companies and their millions of customers don’t have blood on their hands. Well, maybe.

After reading a piece by Nick Kristof in the Times last year – “Death by Gadget” – an Apple fan fired off an email to Steve Jobs asking how Apple ensures that its materials aren’t coming from a conflict hot zone, much like the “blood diamonds” that became infamous in recent decades. About an hour later, a reply showed up in his inbox:

Yes. We require all of our suppliers to certify in writing that they use conflict few [free] materials. But honestly there is no way for them to be sure. Until someone invents a way to chemically trace minerals from the source mine, it’s a very difficult problem.

Sent from my iPhone

As Suroosh Alvi and Jason Mojica reported in their trip to the Democratic Republic of Congo earlier this year for Vice / Motherboard (article here, and the video is at the bottom of this post), the source of the materials used to make these pretty things – materials like tungsten, tantalum, tin, and gold – aren’t pretty. For decades, they’ve helped to fund a terrible, now smoldering, civil war.

Can We Have Gadgets That Are Not Made of Blood | Motherboard

From the Shareable archives: Demanding Ethical Gadgets

by paulmdavis January 10, 2012
Three very similar compressed software development training programs have emerged in the last few months: Code Academy (not to be confused with the startup Codecademy) in Chicago, Dev Bootcamp in the Bay Area, and Hacker School in New York City. All offer a short (two or three month), project-based learning program geared toward acquiring real-world development skills. Hacker School is free and aimed at proficient programmers trying to advance their skills, while Dev Bootcamp and Code Academy are aimed at motivated students in a broad range of skill levels, including beginners. All three involve placement of graduating students at software companies as a revenue source. As the historical model of education continues to come into contact with disruptive technologies, those technologies strike increasingly close to the heart of education’s basic value proposition. Institutions like University of Phoenix leverage the internet to provide students with degrees more flexibly and inexpensively. This means lower profit margins per student for Phoenix, but much greater scalability than the traditional university model. Khan Academy and similar online learning programs ignore the degree/certification aspect. Instead, they aim a level deeper—at the actual provision of knowledge and learning—as the target of their technological optimization.
by paulmdavis January 6, 2012
by paulmdavis January 4, 2012

Shareable’s looking for a tech-savvy freelance reporter with knowledge re: data aggregation and analysis, privacy issues, and the commons, to work on a potential article. Could lead to future articles or become a series. Email paul [at] shareable.net